No, I will not tell you about David Bowie.
First of all, what is considered life? Maybe you could say that any simple form
or organism is considered life, or maybe you think in a more complex and conscious
organism. What I want is to take both points of view and make the same comparison,
but in two different topics.
Scientists have always tried to prove the existence of life in other planets. Some of them say that the only thing you need
for life to exist is methane, which consists of one carbon and four hydrogen
atoms, simple, right? And they have tried to find it in the outer space. They
affirm that finding that molecule means finding life. Nevertheless, some other
men of science think that life is more complex than that, and that molecule
only provides the chance for living organisms to exist.
And now, let’s see it from another point of
view; the human life. The same scientists that assure that methane means life are supporters of the morning-after pill. Which
basically eliminates the zygote, preventing the embryo to fully develop. Why is
it that they do not consider that same zygote represents life in the same way
that an even more simple molecule of methane? I leave you the answer to you.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.